Does God really dwell in darkness? (1 Kings 8:12) Question: The Bible says that God dwells in light (1 Timothy 6:16, John 1:5), but it also mentions that God dwells in darkness (1 Kings 8:12). Does this seem contradictory? Answer: Let’s carefully examine these verses and explore the theological context before explaining further. 1 Timothy 6:16 “Who alone is immortal and who lives in unapproachable light, whom no one has seen or can see. To Him be honor and might forever. Amen.” This passage reveals a fundamental truth about God’s nature. He lives in “unapproachable light”—a light so pure and glorious that no human can fully comprehend or come near it. This highlights God’s transcendence and holiness, setting Him apart from all creation (1 John 1:5). Theologically, God’s light symbolizes His absolute purity, righteousness, and glory, which are beyond human reach or understanding. 1 Kings 8:12 “Then Solomon said, ‘The Lord said that He would dwell in thick darkness.’ 13 I have indeed built a magnificent temple for you, a place for you to dwell forever.” In this passage, Solomon reflects on the fact that, despite the magnificence of the temple he has built for God, God’s presence is still described as dwelling in “thick darkness.” This highlights the mystery of God’s immanence and transcendence. While God is in unapproachable light, He can also manifest His presence in ways that are beyond human comprehension—like in “thick darkness,” which often represents God’s holiness and the awe-inspiring nature of His presence. This darkness does not mean literal absence but rather points to the awe and reverence God demands in His presence. Theological Explanation: No Contradiction At first glance, these passages may seem contradictory—God is described as dwelling in light (1 Timothy 6:16) and in darkness (1 Kings 8:12). However, the Bible is consistent when we understand that God’s essence is beyond human comprehension and cannot be fully described by either light or darkness alone. God’s Light: In His essence, God is light. 1 John 1:5 says, “God is light; in Him, there is no darkness at all.” This emphasizes that God, in His purest form, is light, representing His holiness, goodness, and righteousness. Theological scholars describe this as God’s transcendence—the idea that God is wholly other and cannot be fully grasped by human beings. God’s Darkness: When Scripture refers to God dwelling in darkness, it is a metaphor for His holiness and the awe-inspiring mystery of His being. In the Bible, darkness often symbolizes God’s unapproachable majesty. For instance, in Exodus 20:21, when Moses approaches the mountain where God’s presence was, it is surrounded by thick darkness. This “darkness” is not negative but highlights God’s overwhelming glory and the need for reverence. It serves as a reminder that God’s presence is both near and far—He is present with His people, yet His full essence remains hidden. The Role of Sacrifice and Offering to God In the Bible, God consistently asks His people to offer Him their best because of the kind of relationship He desires with them. This is especially relevant in the context of the temple Solomon built. Theologically, the temple represents the physical manifestation of God’s dwelling among His people. Solomon’s desire to build a house for God, despite God’s infinite nature, is a reflection of God’s relationship with humanity—He wants to dwell with His people, but He also requires holiness and reverence. Malachi 1:8 says, “ When you offer blind animals for sacrifice, is that not wrong? When you offer lame or diseased animals, is that not wrong? Try offering them to your governor! Would he be pleased with you? Would he accept you?” Here, God is showing that He deserves the best, just as earthly rulers would expect the best offerings. 2 Samuel 24:24 says, “ But the king replied to Araunah, ‘No, I insist on paying you for it. I will not sacrifice to the Lord my God burnt offerings that cost me nothing.'” David’s heart here is key: when offering to God, it should come at a personal cost, symbolizing sincere devotion and honoring God’s greatness. 1 Kings 8:26-28 “Now, O God of Israel, let Your word that You promised Your servant David, my father, come true. 27 But will God really dwell on earth? The heavens, even the highest heavens, cannot contain You. How much less this temple I have built! 28 Yet give attention to Your servant’s prayer and his plea for mercy, O Lord my God. Hear the cry and the prayer that Your servant is praying in Your presence this day.” Here, Solomon acknowledges the paradox of God’s presence. While the temple he built is magnificent, he humbly admits that even the heavens cannot contain God. God, in His immensity, cannot be confined to a building, no matter how grand. This understanding aligns with Acts 7:48-50, where Stephen says, “However, the Most High does not live in houses made by human hands . As the prophet says: ‘ Heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool. What kind of house will you build for me? says the Lord.'” God transcends all created things, yet He still desires a relationship with His people and dwells among them in a way that is both near and awe-inspiring. Theological Reflection: God’s Relationship with Us Even though God cannot be contained in a temple or building, He still desires to dwell with His people. His “dwelling” with us is not about the physical space, but about the relationship He offers. Theologically, this points to God’s immanence—His presence with His people, even though He is also transcendent. God’s dwelling in the “thick darkness” symbolizes that while He is near to us, His full essence remains a mystery, reminding us of His holiness. David and Solomon’s desire to build a temple was not about making God a home, but about creating a space that reflects the honor and reverence due to Him. Their actions teach us that even though God owns everything and needs nothing, we are called to honor Him with our best, acknowledging His greatness and holiness. The temple was a physical space that pointed to a greater spiritual truth: that God wants to dwell with His people, but this relationship requires holiness and reverence. What Can We Learn from This? God is great and transcendent, yet He desires a relationship with us. If we live in a beautiful home but our place of worship is dark, we must think twice. Don’t dismiss the importance of honoring God with our best, even when we know that He doesn’t need anything from us. Just like David and Solomon wanted to build a house for God, we are also called to give Him our best, as an act of love and reverence. Deuteronomy 4:24 says, “For the Lord your God is a consuming fire, a jealous God.” This jealousy is not about selfishness, but a desire for His people to recognize His worth and give Him the honor He deserves. Matthew 25:40 says, “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’” Our service to God is also reflected in how we honor Him through serving others. Conclusion Let’s reflect on how we treat the things that represent God in our lives. If we value our possessions and books, we must also value our relationship with God by giving Him the honor He deserves. The way we approach God’s Word, His house, and our offerings to Him speaks volumes about our reverence for His greatness. Maranatha!Please share this message with others.
The Question: In Mark 6:8, Jesus appears to allow His disciples to take a staff with them on their mission: “He charged them to take nothing for their journey except a staff—no bread, no bag, no money in their belts.” (ESV) But in Matthew 10:10, Jesus seems to say the opposite: “… no bag for your journey, or two tunics or sandals or a staff, for the laborer deserves his food.” (ESV) So which account is right? Did Jesus permit His disciples to carry a staff or not? Is this a contradiction in the Bible? The Answer: No, the Bible Does Not Contradict Itself The seeming difference between these two passages is not a contradiction, but a matter of context, emphasis, and translation. The Bible is divinely inspired and internally consistent. Scripture affirms, “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness.” (2 Timothy 3:16) If God is not the author of confusion (1 Corinthians 14:33), then any confusion lies in our interpretation—not in God’s Word. Understanding the Context and Purpose In Mark 6:8, Jesus was emphasizing that the disciples were to travel light—depending entirely on God for their provision. The only item they were allowed to take was a walking staff, a practical tool for travelers, especially on rough and rugged terrain. The staff here symbolizes support, not self-sufficiency. In Matthew 10:10, however, the focus is on complete dependence on God’s provision through others, especially those who would receive the Gospel. Jesus says not to carry even a staff, as if to reinforce that their security and help would come entirely from God’s guidance and people’s hospitality. “The laborer deserves his food.” (Matthew 10:10)This means that those who serve the Gospel should trust God to provide for them through the people they minister to (see also Luke 10:7). Theological Explanation: One Staff or None? The key to reconciling these passages lies in the original Greek and the purpose of the instruction: In Mark, the word for “staff” (Greek: rhabdon) refers to a single, personal walking stick — not a weapon or supply item. In Matthew, many scholars believe Jesus is forbidding extra provisions, like carrying an additional staff, just as He tells them not to take “two tunics” or extra sandals. This aligns with His broader teaching in Matthew 6:31–33: “Do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’… But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.” Jesus was teaching His disciples to walk by faith, not by sight (2 Corinthians 5:7), and to rely on divine provision rather than human preparation. Not Just About the Staff Jesus also instructs them not to take: Money — showing they were not to commercialize ministry. Extra clothes or shoes — teaching contentment and simplicity. A travel bag — to avoid burdensome dependence on material things. “Provide neither gold nor silver nor copper in your money belts, nor bag for your journey, nor two tunics, nor sandals, nor staffs…” (Matthew 10:9–10, NKJV) Again, the concern wasn’t the physical items themselves, but the attitude of self-reliance they might represent. This was a mission of faith, and their dependence had to be on God, not their belongings. Conclusion: Both Accounts Are True There is no contradiction between Mark 6:8 and Matthew 10:10. Rather, each Gospel writer highlights a different aspect of Jesus’ instruction: Mark emphasizes what the disciples were permitted to take — one staff only. Matthew emphasizes what they should not accumulate — no extras, not even another staff. The Bible’s message is consistent: Trust in God completely. Just as Jesus taught them to pray “Give us this day our daily bread” (Matthew 6:11), He was also teaching them to live that prayer — daily dependence on the Father. “The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.” (Psalm 23:1)