Category Archive bible questions

  • Home   /  
  • Archive by category "bible questions"
    • ( Page24 )

Did Abram Leave Haran Before or After His Father Terah Died?

The Apparent Conflict

When reading Genesis, a timeline issue may seem to arise regarding Abram’s departure from Haran and the death of his father, Terah.

Genesis 11:26
“When Terah had lived 70 years, he fathered Abram, Nahor, and Haran.”

Genesis 11:32
“The days of Terah were 205 years, and Terah died in Haran.”

Genesis 12:4
“So Abram went, as the Lord had told him, and Lot went with him. Abram was seventy-five years old when he departed from Haran.”

At face value, if Terah fathered Abram at age 70 and Abram left Haran at age 75, Terah would have died at 145 (70 + 75), not 205. Yet Scripture clearly states Terah lived to 205. This raises the question:
Did Abram leave Haran before or after Terah died?

The New Testament Clarifies It

To resolve this, we turn to Acts 7:2–4, where Stephen recounts the story of Abraham:

Acts 7:2–4
“Brothers and fathers, hear me: The God of glory appeared to our father Abraham when he was in Mesopotamia, before he lived in Haran, and said to him, ‘Go out from your land and from your kindred and go into the land that I will show you.’ Then he went out from the land of the Chaldeans and lived in Haran. And after his father died, God removed him from there into this land in which you are now living.”

Stephen, filled with the Holy Spirit, confirms that Abram left Haran after the death of Terah, which supports Genesis 11:32’s statement that Terah died at age 205.

Reconciling the Timeline: Who Was Born First?

The misunderstanding comes from assuming Abram was Terah’s firstborn son, born when Terah was 70. However, that’s not necessarily the case.

Genesis 11:26

“When Terah had lived 70 years, he fathered Abram, Nahor, and Haran.”

But this is a summary verse, not a birth order statement. The three sons are listed with Abram first not because he was the eldest, but because he is the most significant in redemptive history.

Evidence That Haran Was the Eldest

There are strong contextual clues that suggest Haran was older than Abram:

  1. Lot, Haran’s son, was an adult when he traveled with Abram (Genesis 12:5).
  2. Milcah, Haran’s daughter, married Nahor, Abram’s brother (Genesis 11:29).
    This means Haran had grown children before Abram and Nahor married—suggesting Haran was older.
  3. Terah’s oldest son was likely Haran, born when Terah was 70. If Abram was born significantly later, say when Terah was 130, this would align the timeline correctly.

There is no contradiction. The Bible harmonizes perfectly when understood in its historical and literary context. The confusion arises only if we assume Abram was the eldest child, which Scripture does not state.

Print this post

Were 23,000 or 24,000 Israelites Killed by the Plague at Shittim?

Were 23,000 or 24,000 Israelites Killed by the Plague at Shittim?

The Question:
Did 23,000 or 24,000 Israelites die in the plague at Shittim? Numbers 25:9 records 24,000 deaths, but 1 Corinthians 10:8 says 23,000. Does this mean the Bible contradicts itself?

The Answer:
No, the Bible is consistent and trustworthy. Both numbers are accurate when understood in their context.

The Biblical Account

In Numbers 25:1-9

“While Israel was staying in Shittim, the men began to indulge in sexual immorality with Moabite women… Then the Lord’s anger burned against them… Those who died in the plague numbered 24,000.”

The passage describes Israel’s sin of idolatry combined with sexual immorality, provoking God’s judgment through a deadly plague. Phinehas’s zealous act stopped the plague (Numbers 25:7-8).

Paul’s Reference

In 1 Corinthians 10:8, Paul says:

“We should not commit sexual immorality, as some of them did—and in one day twenty-three thousand of them died.”

Paul highlights how quickly sin can bring devastating consequences—23,000 died in one day.

Explanation

The difference between 23,000 and 24,000 can be understood as follows:

  • The total death toll was 24,000, as recorded in Numbers.
  • Paul, writing to the Corinthians, emphasizes the severity of the first day’s judgment—23,000 died quickly due to sexual sin.

  • The plague likely lasted more than one day; by the end, 24,000 had died.

This aligns with biblical teaching on sin’s consequences:

  • Sin separates us from God (Isaiah 59:2).
  • Sexual immorality is especially destructive because it involves the body, which is the temple of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:18-20).

Sexual Sin and the Body of Christ

Paul explains in 1 Corinthians 6:15-20

“Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ himself?… Flee from sexual immorality… your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit.”

The body is not just physical but sacred, entrusted to us by God. Sexual sin violates this holiness and has serious spiritual consequences.

Wisdom from Proverbs

Proverbs 6:32 says:

“But a man who commits adultery has no sense; whoever does so destroys himself.”

This warns of the self-destructive nature of sexual sin.

How to Overcome Sexual Sin

The Bible’s solution is not just repentance but avoidance and fleeing temptation, as Joseph demonstrated (Genesis 39). Paul commands:

“Flee from sexual immorality.” (1 Corinthians 6:18,)

Summary of Lessons

  • The total deaths from the plague at Shittim were 24,000 (Numbers 25:9).
  • 23,000 died in one day, showing the suddenness of God’s judgment on sin (1 Corinthians 10:8).
  • Sexual immorality carries swift, severe consequences because it defiles the body, the temple of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:18-20).
  • Sin separates us from God and destroys us spiritually (Isaiah 59:2, Proverbs 6:32).
  • The best defense is to flee from temptation, honoring God with your body (1 Corinthians 6:18).

Shalom.

Print this post

Understanding Ecclesiastes 10:16: A Theological Insight into Immature and Self-Serving Leadership

“Woe to you, O land, when your king is a child, and your princes feast in the morning!”
Ecclesiastes 10:16 (NKJV)

This verse offers a powerful warning about the dangers of unwise leadership. Let’s examine both parts of the verse and unpack what they reveal—not just for political leaders, but also for spiritual leaders today.

1. “Woe to you, O land, when your king is a child”   The Danger of Immature Leadership

In this context, “child” doesn’t only refer to age, but to lack of maturity, wisdom, and discernment. A young or inexperienced ruler may not yet understand the weight of leadership, often acting impulsively or relying on poor counsel.

A biblical example of wisdom in youth is King Solomon, who recognized his inexperience and turned to God for guidance:

“Now, O Lord my God, You have made Your servant king instead of my father David, but I am a little child; I do not know how to go out or come in.”
1 Kings 3:7 (NKJV)

Solomon’s humility moved him to ask for wisdom rather than riches or fame:

“Therefore give to Your servant an understanding heart to judge Your people, that I may discern between good and evil.”
1 Kings 3:9 (NKJV)

This request pleased God, who granted him wisdom beyond measure (1 Kings 3:10-12).

By contrast, Solomon’s son Rehoboam failed to follow this example. Instead of listening to the elders, he took advice from his peers, resulting in the division of the kingdom:

“But he rejected the advice which the elders had given him, and consulted the young men who had grown up with him…”
1 Kings 12:8 (NKJV)

This poor decision led to the rebellion of ten tribes and the weakening of Israel’s unity (1 Kings 12:16).

Leadership without wisdom leads to national instability, poor governance, and suffering among the people.

2. “And your princes feast in the morning”  Self-Indulgent Leadership

In biblical times, feasting in the morning was a symbol of indulgence and laziness. Morning was traditionally reserved for work, planning, and service not for luxury or celebration. When leaders prioritize pleasure and personal gain over duty and service, it’s a sign of corruption.

The prophet Isaiah condemned similar behavior in his time:

“But instead, joy and gladness, slaying oxen and killing sheep, eating meat and drinking wine: ‘Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die!’”
Isaiah 22:13 (NKJV)

Such attitudes among leaders lead to injustice, oppression, and the decay of societal values. In today’s world, we see this in governments and institutions where leaders enrich themselves while citizens suffer.

Spiritually, this is a warning to Christian leaders as well. If pastors, bishops, or ministers use their positions for self-gain instead of serving God’s people, they are no different from the princes who feast early.

Jesus modeled servant leadership:

“The Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many.”
Matthew 20:28 (NKJV)

Likewise, church leaders are called to shepherd God’s flock with humility and sincerity:

“Shepherd the flock of God which is among you, serving as overseers, not by compulsion but willingly, not for dishonest gain but eagerly.”
1 Peter 5:2 (NKJV)

Spiritual Application for Today

This verse is a call to:

  1. Seek wisdom in leadership  Whether you are young in age or new in ministry, pray for God’s wisdom (James 1:5). Learn from experienced, God-fearing leaders.

  2. Avoid selfish ambition  Leadership is not about status or wealth, but about service and sacrifice.

  3. Build God’s kingdom first  Before investing in personal comfort, consider the needs of the Church and the people you lead. As Haggai warned:

“Is it time for you yourselves to dwell in your paneled houses, and this temple to lie in ruins?”
Haggai 1:4 (NKJV)

Conclusion

Ecclesiastes 10:16 is more than an observation about politics it’s a spiritual principle. Nations and ministries suffer when leaders are immature and self-centered. But when leaders seek wisdom, serve selflessly, and honor God above all, both the people and the land are blessed.

May we take this as a call to prayer, humility, and integrity in all areas of leadership.

God bless you.

Please share this message with others.

 

Print this post

Did Jesus Allow His Disciples to Carry a Staff or Not? (Mark 6:8 vs. Matthew 10:10)

 

The Question:

In Mark 6:8, Jesus appears to allow His disciples to take a staff with them on their mission:

“He charged them to take nothing for their journey except a staff—no bread, no bag, no money in their belts.” (ESV)

But in Matthew 10:10, Jesus seems to say the opposite:

“… no bag for your journey, or two tunics or sandals or a staff, for the laborer deserves his food.” (ESV)

So which account is right? Did Jesus permit His disciples to carry a staff or not? Is this a contradiction in the Bible?

The Answer: No, the Bible Does Not Contradict Itself

The seeming difference between these two passages is not a contradiction, but a matter of context, emphasis, and translation. The Bible is divinely inspired and internally consistent. Scripture affirms,

“All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness.” (2 Timothy 3:16)

If God is not the author of confusion (1 Corinthians 14:33), then any confusion lies in our interpretation—not in God’s Word.

Understanding the Context and Purpose

In Mark 6:8, Jesus was emphasizing that the disciples were to travel light—depending entirely on God for their provision. The only item they were allowed to take was a walking staff, a practical tool for travelers, especially on rough and rugged terrain. The staff here symbolizes support, not self-sufficiency.

In Matthew 10:10, however, the focus is on complete dependence on God’s provision through others, especially those who would receive the Gospel. Jesus says not to carry even a staff, as if to reinforce that their security and help would come entirely from God’s guidance and people’s hospitality.

“The laborer deserves his food.” (Matthew 10:10)
This means that those who serve the Gospel should trust God to provide for them through the people they minister to (see also Luke 10:7).

Theological Explanation: One Staff or None?

The key to reconciling these passages lies in the original Greek and the purpose of the instruction:

  • In Mark, the word for “staff” (Greek: rhabdon) refers to a single, personal walking stick — not a weapon or supply item.

  • In Matthew, many scholars believe Jesus is forbidding extra provisions, like carrying an additional staff, just as He tells them not to take “two tunics” or extra sandals.

This aligns with His broader teaching in Matthew 6:31–33:

“Do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’… But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.”

Jesus was teaching His disciples to walk by faith, not by sight (2 Corinthians 5:7), and to rely on divine provision rather than human preparation.

Not Just About the Staff

Jesus also instructs them not to take:

  • Money — showing they were not to commercialize ministry.

  • Extra clothes or shoes — teaching contentment and simplicity.

  • A travel bag — to avoid burdensome dependence on material things.

“Provide neither gold nor silver nor copper in your money belts, nor bag for your journey, nor two tunics, nor sandals, nor staffs…” (Matthew 10:9–10, NKJV)

Again, the concern wasn’t the physical items themselves, but the attitude of self-reliance they might represent. This was a mission of faith, and their dependence had to be on God, not their belongings.

Conclusion: Both Accounts Are True

There is no contradiction between Mark 6:8 and Matthew 10:10. Rather, each Gospel writer highlights a different aspect of Jesus’ instruction:

  • Mark emphasizes what the disciples were permitted to take — one staff only.

  • Matthew emphasizes what they should not accumulate — no extras, not even another staff.

The Bible’s message is consistent: Trust in God completely. Just as Jesus taught them to pray “Give us this day our daily bread” (Matthew 6:11), He was also teaching them to live that prayer — daily dependence on the Father.

“The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.” (Psalm 23:1)

 

Print this post

Why Is Jesus Called the Lamb of God?

In John 1:29, the Bible says:

“The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, ‘Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!’”

This phrase—“Lamb of God”—is rich with theological meaning. It connects Jesus to the Old Testament sacrificial system, where lambs were offered as atonement for sin. In Exodus 12, during the first Passover, each Israelite family was instructed to sacrifice a spotless lamb and mark their doorposts with its blood. This act spared them from judgment. That lamb became a symbol of salvation through substitution—an innocent life given to save others.

Jesus is the fulfillment of that symbol. He is the true Passover Lamb—sinless and perfect—offered once and for all to take away the sins of the world.

1 Corinthians 5:7b – “For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.”

Isaiah 53:7 – “He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.”

These passages emphasize both the gentleness and the submissiveness of Jesus. He did not resist the cross. He willingly offered Himself in silence, just as a lamb does not protest when being sacrificed.

From a character perspective, a lamb is gentle, humble, and entirely dependent on its shepherd. This makes it different from other animals like goats or cattle. A lamb doesn’t try to defend itself—it trusts its shepherd completely.

This is why Jesus is not compared to a mature ram, which might have aggressive tendencies. Instead, He is likened to a young lamb—vulnerable, innocent, and obedient. His nature reflects divine humility and self-sacrificial love.

Jesus affirms this in His own words:

Matthew 11:28–30 –
“Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.
Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”

Again, in Matthew 21:5, His humility is described during His entry into Jerusalem:

“Say to Daughter Zion, ‘See, your king comes to you, gentle and riding on a donkey, and on a colt, the foal of a donkey.’”

The Lamb of God is not only gentle—He is also the Savior. He carried the punishment for our sins, offering reconciliation with God for anyone who believes in Him:

Romans 5:8 – “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”

Hebrews 9:26b – “But he has appeared once for all at the culmination of the ages to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself.”

Have You Responded to the Lamb’s Call?

Jesus, the Lamb of God, is speaking to you gently—inviting you to repent, turn from sin, and receive eternal life. His voice isn’t loud or forceful. It’s a whisper in your heart, filled with love and grace.

If you haven’t yet accepted His invitation, what’s stopping you?

Today can be the day of your salvation. Believe in Jesus Christ. Be baptized in His name. Receive the Holy Spirit. Your sins will be forgiven, your heart renewed, and your name written in the Lamb’s Book of Life:

Revelation 21:27 – “Nothing impure will ever enter it, nor will anyone who does what is shameful or deceitful, but only those whose names are written in the Lamb’s book of life.”

Print this post

Was the Enoch Who Walked with God the Son of Cain? (Genesis 4:16–17)Answer: Let’s examine Scripture and theology together.

 

Was the Enoch Who Walked with God the Son of Cain? (Genesis 4:16–17)
Answer: Let’s examine Scripture and theology together.

1. Two Different Men Named Enoch

In Genesis 4:16–17, we read:

“So Cain went out from the Lord’s presence and lived in the land of Nod, east of Eden. Cain made love to his wife, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Enoch. Cain was then building a city, and he named it after his son Enoch.” (NIV)

This Enoch was the son of Cain, the firstborn of Adam and Eve who murdered his brother Abel. This lineage is often referred to as the ungodly line, as Cain’s descendants lived lives largely apart from the fear of God. Cain’s line includes Lamech, who introduced polygamy and glorified violence (Genesis 4:19, 23–24). There’s no biblical record of spiritual devotion or righteousness among Cain’s descendants.

In contrast, the Enoch who “walked faithfully with God” is found in

Genesis 5:18–24:

“When Jared had lived 162 years, he became the father of Enoch… Enoch walked faithfully with God 300 years and had other sons and daughters… Enoch walked faithfully with God; then he was no more, because God took him away.” (NIV)

This Enoch was a descendant of Seth, the third son of Adam, and is part of what’s often called the godly line. Seth’s descendants began to “call on the name of the Lord” (Genesis 4:26), indicating a return to worship and relationship with God.

2. Theological Significance of Enoch’s Walk with God

Enoch’s relationship with God was so intimate that he did not experience death. He is one of only two people in the Old Testament who were taken to heaven without dying—the other being Elijah (2 Kings 2:11).

Hebrews 11:5 confirms this:

“By faith Enoch was taken from this life, so that he did not experience death: ‘He could not be found, because God had taken him away.’ For before he was taken, he was commended as one who pleased God.” (NIV)

This sets Enoch apart as a prophetic figure who lived a life of faith in the midst of a corrupt and fallen world. He serves as a symbol of hope that intimacy with God can overcome the curse of death, pointing forward to eternal life through Christ.

3. Enoch’s Prophecy and the Day of the Lord

Enoch is also recognized as a prophet. In Jude 1:14–15, he prophesied about the coming judgment:

Jude 1 : 14-15

“Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about them: ‘See, the Lord is coming with thousands upon thousands of his holy ones to judge everyone, and to convict all of them of all the ungodly acts they have committed…’” (NIV)

This prophecy aligns with Revelation 19:11–16, which describes Christ returning with the armies of heaven to judge the nations. Enoch, long before the flood or the giving of the Law, foresaw this climactic moment in redemptive history. His prophetic insight shows that God’s plan for final judgment and the establishment of His kingdom has been consistent from the beginning.

4. Practical Lessons from Enoch’s Life

  • Walking with God: Enoch models consistent, daily communion with God—not just obedience to laws, but a living relationship.

  • Pleasing God by Faith: Hebrews 11:6 tells us, “Without faith it is impossible to please God.” Enoch’s life teaches that true faith results in a life that honors God.

  • Hope Beyond Death: Enoch’s translation into heaven points us toward our ultimate hope of eternal life through Christ, who conquered death (John 11:25–26).

 

So, no—the Enoch who walked with God was not the son of Cain. He was a descendant of Seth and the seventh generation from Adam. His life stands in stark contrast to the Enoch from Cain’s line. Though they shared the same name, their legacies could not be more different—one rooted in rebellion and self-promotion, the other in righteousness and intimacy with God.

May we follow the example of the godly Enoch and walk faithfully with God, especially in a world that mirrors the moral decay of Cain’s descendants. As we await Christ’s return, may our lives also prophesy through our faith, hope, and obedience.

Maranatha—Come, Lord Jesus!

 

Print this post

What Does Colossians 3:5 Mean?

Print this post

 

What Is Food Sacrificed to Idols? (Acts 21:25)

Answer:

In Acts 21:25 (ESV), the early Church gave a clear instruction to Gentile believers:

“But as for the Gentiles who have believed, we have sent a letter with our judgment that they should abstain from what has been sacrificed to idols, and from blood, and from what has been strangled, and from sexual immorality.”

The phrase “food sacrificed to idols” refers to any food that has been offered as part of spiritual rituals not directed to the one true God, but to false gods, demons, or ancestral spirits. These are often tied to occult practices or traditional beliefs that do not align with the teachings of Christ.

Biblical and Theological Background

Throughout Scripture, God warns His people to avoid participating in pagan worship, including consuming food offered in such contexts. In the Old Testament, God set Israel apart from the nations by forbidding them to eat sacrifices offered to idols (see Leviticus 17:7, Deuteronomy 32:16–17).

This same principle carries into the New Testament. Paul, writing to the Corinthian church—a community surrounded by idol worship—warned them:

1 Corinthians 10:19–21 (ESV)
“What do I imply then? That food offered to idols is anything, or that an idol is anything? No, I imply that what pagans sacrifice they offer to demons and not to God. I do not want you to be participants with demons. You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons.”

Paul makes it clear: while idols themselves are powerless, the act of sacrifice is spiritually significant because it involves demonic beings. To partake in such food is to enter into spiritual fellowship with demonic forces.

Modern Examples of Food Sacrificed to Idols

Even today, in many cultures, people may unknowingly (or knowingly) eat food offered to spirits or ancestors:

A traditional ritual may require someone to sacrifice a goat or chicken to ancestral spirits, then eat the meat as a sign of union with those spirits.

A witch doctor or spiritualist may request a food or animal offering to solve a problem or bring protection. This is often followed by the client eating part of the offering.

Grain or drink offerings may be presented to deities, and people may be invited to eat or drink from it as part of a ritual.

Whether animal or grain, the spiritual act of dedicating food to any being other than the Triune God makes it “sacrificed to idols.” Eating it brings spiritual consequences.

Why It’s Spiritually Dangerous

Participation in idol sacrifices is more than a physical act—it establishes spiritual alignment with that false altar. Scripture consistently portrays eating such food as entering into covenant or fellowship with demons. This is why Paul insists Christians must avoid it completely:

2 Corinthians 6:14–16 (ESV)
“Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? … What agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God.”

What If You Ate It Unknowingly?

If you were unknowingly served food that had been offered to idols—perhaps at a feast or in someone’s home—there is no condemnation:

Mark 16:17–18 (ESV)
“And these signs will accompany those who believe… if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them…”

As a believer, your faith and the name of Jesus protect you from unintended harm. However, if you knowingly eat such food, it is considered willful spiritual compromise and must be avoided:

Romans 14:23 (ESV)
“For whatever does not proceed from faith is sin.”

Have You Eaten Such Food in the Past?

If you knowingly or unknowingly participated in such rituals—whether in your family, community, or through a spiritual practitioner—know that it is possible you formed a spiritual tie with demonic powers. These connections may manifest in:

Unexplained oppression or spiritual attacks.Recurring misfortune or bondage.Difficulty in your walk with God.These are not mere superstitions but real spiritual entanglements.

The Biblical Solution for Deliverance

Repent: Confess your involvement and renounce any connection with idolatry or ancestral spirits.

1 John 1:9 (ESV) – “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

Be Baptized Biblically: According to the New Testament pattern, baptism should be by full immersion and in the name of Jesus Christ.

Acts 2:38 (ESV) – “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.”

Receive the Holy Spirit: Seek to be filled with the Holy Spirit for power, guidance, and sanctification.

Acts 1:8 (ESV) – But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you…”

Through these steps, you break all spiritual ties and enter into full freedom in Christ.

John 8:36 (ESV) – “So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.”

May the Lord bless you and lead you into full spiritual freedom.

Please share this message with others who may need it.

 

Print this post

Why did the Jews say to Jesus that they had never been slaves to anyone, even though we know they were enslaved in Egypt for 400 years?

ANSWER:
Let’s read the context from John 8:31–36 (NKJV):

31 Then Jesus said to those Jews who believed Him, “If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed.
32 And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”
33 They answered Him, “We are Abraham’s descendants, and have never been in bondage to anyone. How can You say, ‘You will be made free’?”
34 Jesus answered them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin.
35 And a slave does not abide in the house forever, but a son abides forever.
36 Therefore if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed.”

The response of these Jews—“We have never been in bondage to anyone”—was clearly untrue from a historical standpoint. The Old Testament is full of accounts showing that the Israelites were, in fact, enslaved and oppressed multiple times:

  • In Egypt, for over 400 years (Exodus 1:8–14)

  • In Babylon, during the exile (2 Kings 24–25)

  • Under the Assyrians, especially the Northern Kingdom (2 Kings 17)

  • Under Persian, Greek, and Roman domination, even in Jesus’ time

So why did they claim they had never been enslaved?

The answer lies not in historical accuracy but in pride and resistance to Jesus’ message. They were not honestly engaging in discussion but rather trying to contradict and discredit Jesus. Their statement reflects a spiritual blindness and arrogance—they were proud of being Abraham’s physical descendants and assumed that this heritage guaranteed their freedom and favor with God.

Yet Jesus wasn’t talking about political or physical bondage, but about spiritual slavery to sin. That’s why He said in verse 34, “Whoever commits sin is a slave of sin.” According to Scripture, all people are born into sin (Psalm 51:5; Romans 3:23), and only through Jesus can one be truly set free.

When they continued to argue and even accused Jesus of being a Samaritan and demon-possessed (John 8:48), it showed their hearts were hardened. They were not seeking truth, but rather defending their pride and position—even through lies. Ironically, they knew Jesus was a Jew, the son of Joseph the carpenter (Matthew 13:55), and they even called Him “Rabbi” (John 3:2) at other times. But here, in their rejection, they resorted to slander.

That is why Jesus responded strongly in John 8:44:

“You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it.”

Jesus exposed the true source of their rebellion: Satan, the father of lies.

What does this teach us today?

It teaches us the importance of loving the truth and abiding in God’s Word. If we reject the truth, we become vulnerable to lies—even to the point of opposing God unknowingly. Like the Jews in this passage, people can be outwardly religious but spiritually enslaved.

Only Jesus Christ can set us free—not from human oppressors, but from the deeper bondage of sin, guilt, shame, and eternal death. When we accept Him, we move from being slaves to being children of God (Romans 8:15–17).

Personal Reflection:

Are you truly free? Have you been set free by the Son? These are the last days, and the spirit of the antichrist is already at work in those who reject Christ (1 John 2:18–22). The temptations and distractions of this world cannot save us—they enslave us further. But Jesus came to break those chains.

If you are ready to give your life to Christ and experience true freedom, reach out to us at +255693036618 or +255789001312 for free spiritual guidance.

May the Lord bless you and lead you into His truth.

Print this post

What is the meaning of Iscariot? And why was Judas called Iscariot?

Why Was Judas Called “Iscariot”? 

Introduction
The name Iscariot often raises curiosity. Many wonder if it was the name of Judas’s father, a personal surname, or something else. A closer look at Scripture and historical context reveals that Iscariot was not a personal name at all—but rather, a reference to Judas’s origin. Understanding this name gives us not only clarity but also important theological insights into identity, character, and God’s knowledge of individuals.

The Meaning of “Iscariot”

The word Iscariot likely comes from the Greek “Iskariōtēs” (Ἰσκαριώτης), which itself is derived from Hebrew/Aramaic. Scholars agree it means “man of Kerioth” or “from Kerioth.”

  • “Ish” (אִישׁ) in Hebrew means “man of”

  • “Kerioth” is a town mentioned in the Old Testament (Joshua 15:25)

Thus, Judas Iscariot means “Judas, man of Kerioth.”

Kerioth was a town located in the southern part of Judah (Joshua 15:25), though some references like Jeremiah 48:24 and Amos 2:2 associate a place called Kerioth with Moab, east of the Jordan River. If Judas was indeed from the Moabite Kerioth, it might suggest non-Israelite lineage—though this remains debated. Either way, the name functioned as a geographical identifier.

Why Not Just “Judas”?

The name Judas (Greek: Ioudas) was common in Jewish culture, derived from Judah, one of the twelve tribes of Israel. Among Jesus’ disciples, there were at least two Judases:

  1. Judas Iscariot, the betrayer

  2. Judas (son of James), also called Thaddaeus (Luke 6:16)

To avoid confusion, New Testament writers often used surnames, nicknames, or place-based identifiers. Similarly:

  • Simon Peter was distinguished from Simon the Zealot (Matthew 10:2–4)

  • Mary Magdalene was identified by her town, Magdala (Luke 8:2)

So, Judas Iscariot was identified by his origin—Kerioth—to distinguish him from the other Judas.

Was Judas’s Father Also From Kerioth?

Scripture hints at this.


John 6:71 (NIV): “He meant Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, who, though one of the Twelve, was later to betray him.”

This verse shows that even Judas’s father, Simon, was known as “Iscariot,” meaning the family likely hailed from Kerioth.
This reinforces the cultural tradition of associating people with their hometowns.

The Theological Angle: God Knows Us by Name and Nature

Names in Scripture often carry spiritual or prophetic weight. In both Old and New Testaments, names reveal identity, calling, or character:

  • Abram becomes Abraham, meaning “father of many” (Genesis 17:5)

  • Jacob becomes Israel, meaning “he struggles with God” (Genesis 32:28)

God not only knows us by name but by our inner character.

Exodus 33:17 (NIV):
“And the Lord said to Moses, ‘I will do the very thing you have asked, because I am pleased with you and I know you by name.’”

This “knowing” isn’t just intellectual—it’s relational and moral. In Scripture, God often “knows” someone based on their heart and walk with Him. That’s why someone may be known as “a man after God’s own heart” (1 Samuel 13:14), while others are remembered for betrayal, deceit, or rebellion.

Character Determines Legacy

Judas Iscariot’s name has become synonymous with betrayal. His physical origin—Kerioth—is now overshadowed by his moral failure. His story reminds us that where you come from matters less than who you choose to become.

John 13:2 (NIV):
“The evening meal was in progress, and the devil had already prompted Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, to betray Jesus.”

Jesus Himself chose Judas knowing his role in prophecy (John 6:64). Yet Judas’s decision to betray Christ was his own. His actions became part of his spiritual identity.

Final Reflection: What Does God Call You?

In God’s eyes, each person is identified not just by their earthly name or place of birth—but by their character, their faith, and their relationship with Him.

May we be known in heaven as:

  • Faithful servants (Matthew 25:21)

  • Friends of God (James 2:23)

  • People after God’s own heart (Acts 13:22)

Let us pray that our names are associated with righteousness, not rebellion.

Revelation 3:5 (NIV):
“The one who is victorious will, like them, be dressed in white. I will never blot out the name of that person from the book of life, but will acknowledge that name before my Father and his angels.”

Maranatha – The Lord is Coming.

Print this post

Archives

Search

Archives

Migawanyo