Category Archive bible questions

Answer: Yes. There were at least two separate anointing events recorded in the Gospels.

One of the most well-known accounts of Jesus being anointed is by Mary of Bethany, the sister of Martha and Lazarus. This event is recorded in John 12:1–3, Matthew 26:6–13, and Mark 14:3–9. These passages describe Mary anointing Jesus six days before the Passover, in the town of Bethany. Let’s look at the account in the Gospel of John:

John 12:1–3 (NIV):
Six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany, where Lazarus lived, whom Jesus had raised from the dead. Here a dinner was given in Jesus’ honor. Martha served, while Lazarus was among those reclining at the table with him. Then Mary took about a pint of pure nard, an expensive perfume; she poured it on Jesus’ feet and wiped his feet with her hair. And the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume.

This act of anointing was one of deep love and devotion, likely also symbolic of Jesus’ impending burial, as He later indicated (John 12:7).

However, in the Gospel of Luke, we find another account that closely resembles this one but contains distinct details and takes place at a different time and location, and involves a different woman.

Luke 7:36–38 (NIV):
When one of the Pharisees invited Jesus to have dinner with him, he went to the Pharisee’s house and reclined at the table. A woman in that town who lived a sinful life learned that Jesus was eating at the Pharisee’s house, so she came there with an alabaster jar of perfume. As she stood behind him at his feet weeping, she began to wet his feet with her tears. Then she wiped them with her hair, kissed them and poured perfume on them.

There are several key differences between the two events:

1. Different Locations

  • Luke 7 occurs in a Pharisee’s house, in one of the towns of Galilee, likely Nain or Capernaum, where Jesus had been preaching (Luke 7:11; Luke 7:1).

  • The John 12 event occurs in Bethany, near Jerusalem in the south, and specifically at the house of Simon the Leper (as identified in Matthew 26:6 and Mark 14:3).

2. Different Timing

  • The event in Luke 7 happens much earlier in Jesus’ ministry, before His final trip to Jerusalem.

  • The anointing by Mary of Bethany occurs just days before His crucifixion, during Passion Week.

3. Different Women

  • In John 12, the woman is explicitly named as Mary, the sister of Lazarus.

  • In Luke 7, the woman is unnamed, only described as a sinful woman”, traditionally understood to be a known sinner, possibly a prostitute (though the Bible does not name her or confirm her background).

4. Different Spiritual Expressions

  • The woman in Luke 7 shows deep repentance, weeping at Jesus’ feet, kissing them, and wiping them with her hair—an outpouring of love from a forgiven sinner (see Luke 7:47–50).

  • Mary of Bethany pours perfume on Jesus in a more worshipful, prophetic act, anticipating His death and burial (John 12:7; Mark 14:8).

Theological Insight:

These accounts highlight different aspects of faith and devotion:

  • Forgiveness leads to loveas seen in Luke 7:47: Therefore, I tell you, her many sins have been forgiven—as her great love has shown.”

  • Reverent worship and prophetic insightas Mary understood something even Jesus’ disciples missed: His death was near, and she honored Him beforehand.

Conclusion:

Yes, there were at least two distinct anointing events involving different women, at different times, in different places, with different motives and spiritual messages.

While the identity of the woman in Luke 7 remains unknown, what matters most is the faith and love displayed in both stories. These acts of anointing are profound illustrations of repentance, worship, and preparation for Christ’s sacrifice.

Print this post

Who Wrote the Book of Psalms?

Understanding the Authorship and Theological Depth of the Psalms
(Scripture references from the New International Version – NIV)

The Book of Psalms is a sacred anthology of prayers, hymns, laments, and praises to God. It is the longest book in the Bible and was written over a span of more than a thousand years. Its multiple contributors reflect a rich diversity of spiritual experience and theology, expressing deep human emotion while focusing on God’s sovereignty, mercy, justice, and faithfulness.


1. King David – The Principal Author (73–75 Psalms)

David, described as “a man after God’s own heart” (1 Samuel 13:14), is the most prolific contributor to the Psalms. His writings reflect a deep, personal relationship with God. David’s Psalms often include themes of repentance (Psalm 51), trust (Psalm 23), worship (Psalm 63), and messianic prophecy (Psalm 22).

Confirmed Davidic Psalms: Psalms 3–9, 11–32, 34–41, 51–65, 68–70, 86, 101, 103, 108–110, 122, 124, 131, 133, 138–145 (Total: 73)

Additional Attributed Psalms:

Psalm 2 – Referenced in Acts 4:25 as being written by David:
“You spoke by the Holy Spirit through the mouth of your servant, our father David: ‘Why do the nations rage…’” (Acts 4:25)

Psalm 95 – Attributed to David in Hebrews 4:7:
“God again set a certain day, calling it ‘Today.’ This he did when a long time later he spoke through David…” (Hebrews 4:7)

Thus, many scholars agree David likely wrote 75 Psalms.


2. Solomon – The Wise King (2 Psalms)

Solomon, renowned for his wisdom (1 Kings 4:29–34), composed two Psalms:

  • Psalm 72 – A royal psalm about the ideal king.
  • Psalm 127 – A reflection on God’s providence in human effort and family life.

3. Moses – The Prophet and Lawgiver (1 Psalm)

Psalm 90“A prayer of Moses, the man of God” – This Psalm stands out for its emphasis on God’s eternity and man’s frailty.
“Before the mountains were born or you brought forth the whole world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God.” (Psalm 90:2)


4. Asaph and His Family – Worship Leaders (12 Psalms)

Asaph was appointed by David as a chief musician (1 Chronicles 16:5). He and his descendants wrote Psalms expressing worship, lament, and national history.

  • Psalms 50, 73–83

5. Sons of Korah – Temple Singers (11 Psalms)

These Levites, descendants of Korah, served in the temple as singers (2 Chronicles 20:19). Their Psalms focus on God’s presence, trust, and refuge.

  • Psalms 42, 44–49, 84–85, 87–88

6. Ethan the Ezrahite – Man of Wisdom (1 Psalm)

Psalm 89 – A reflection on God’s covenant with David, though lamenting its apparent failure.

1 Kings 4:31 notes Ethan’s wisdom:
“He was wiser than anyone else—including Ethan the Ezrahite…”


7. Heman the Ezrahite – Worship Leader (1 Psalm)

  • Psalm 88 – Known as one of the darkest Psalms, expressing deep despair yet still addressed to God.
  • Also mentioned in 1 Kings 4:31 alongside Ethan.

8. Anonymous Authors – (48 Psalms)

These Psalms do not include an author’s name. Despite this, they carry profound theological messages of God’s justice, kingship, deliverance, and covenant faithfulness.


Summary Table of Psalm Authorship


Theological Significance of the Psalms

  • Christ-Centered Prophecy: Many Psalms, especially those of David, point prophetically to the Messiah (e.g., Psalm 22, Psalm 110).
  • Worship & Devotion: Psalms form the foundation of Jewish and Christian worship, emphasizing praise, prayer, and dependence on God.
  • Human Emotion: The Psalms embrace a full range of human experience—joy, fear, sorrow, repentance, and hope—expressed through faith.
  • God’s Nature: They affirm God’s holiness, love, sovereignty, justice, and covenant faithfulness.

“Let everything that has breath praise the Lord. Praise the Lord.” – Psalm 150:6 (NIV)

May the Lord bless you as you read and meditate on His Word.


Print this post

What Was a Sabbath Day’s Journey According to the Bible?

(Acts 1:12  NKJV)

The phrase “Sabbath day’s journey” appears only once in the Bible:

Acts 1:12 (NKJV): “Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a Sabbath day’s journey.”

This term refers to a specific distance that Jews were traditionally allowed to travel on the Sabbath without violating the commandment to rest.


Understanding the Distance

A Sabbath day’s journey was approximately 2,000 cubits, which is roughly 0.6 miles or about 1 kilometer. This limit was not explicitly stated in the Mosaic Law but was established by Jewish rabbinical tradition based on interpretations of Scripture.


Biblical Basis and Rabbinical Interpretation

The foundational scripture often cited for the travel restriction is:

Exodus 16:29 (NKJV):
“See! For the LORD has given you the Sabbath; therefore He gives you on the sixth day bread for two days. Let every man remain in his place; let no man go out of his place on the seventh day.”

From this, rabbis inferred that there was a need for a restriction on how far someone could walk. They reasoned that the phrase “his place” referred to the limits of one’s community or dwelling area.

To determine a reasonable boundary, they referred to:

Numbers 35:4–5 (NKJV):
“The common-land of the cities which you will give the Levites shall extend from the wall of the city outward a thousand cubits all around… You shall measure outside the city on the east side two thousand cubits… the city shall be in the middle. This shall belong to them as common-land for the cities.”

Here, the 2,000 cubits defined a boundary area around a city. Rabbis concluded that this served as a reasonable limit for Sabbath travel  thus, the origin of the “Sabbath day’s journey.”


Why Was the Limit Important?

The purpose behind this travel restriction was spiritual and communal. The Sabbath (Hebrew: Shabbat) was instituted by God as a day of rest and worship, commemorating His rest after creation (Genesis 2:2–3) and later enshrined in the Ten Commandments:

Exodus 20:8–10 (NKJV):
“Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy… In it you shall do no work…”

The Sabbath was a covenant sign between God and Israel (Exodus 31:13), meant to refocus attention on worship, reflection, and rest. Limiting travel kept people near their homes, synagogues, or community gathering places minimizing distractions and worldly activities.


New Testament Context

In Acts 1:12, the apostles returned from the Mount of Olives to Jerusalem after witnessing Jesus’ ascension. Luke notes the distance as “a Sabbath day’s journey” to show it was a short and allowable walk under Jewish law, roughly 0.6 miles.

This detail reflects the Jewish context of the early church and Luke’s intention to tie the narrative to familiar Jewish customs for his readers.


Spiritual Application for Believers Today

While Christians are no longer bound by the Old Testament Sabbath laws (see Colossians 2:16–17; Romans 14:5–6), the principle of setting apart a day for rest and worship remains valuable.

Colossians 2:16–17 (NKJV):
“So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or Sabbaths, which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ.”

Hebrews 4:9–10 (NKJV):
“There remains therefore a rest for the people of God. For he who has entered His rest has himself also ceased from his works as God did from His.”

Today, many Christians regard Sunday as the Lord’s Day (Revelation 1:10), commemorating Jesus’ resurrection. It is not a day for aimless wandering or commercial pursuits, but a time to remain in God’s presence, engage in worship, fellowship, learning, and service.


Practical Encouragement

Let each believer today consider their own “Sabbath journey”  not in terms of physical distance, but in terms of spiritual focus. Avoid unnecessary distractions on the Lord’s Day. Prioritize:

  • Attending church and corporate worship (Hebrews 10:25)
  • Engaging in Bible study and teaching
  • Participating in fellowship and Christian service
  • Resting in God’s presence, physically and spiritually

Let Sunday not be just another busy day, but a holy interruption in our week where we align ourselves with God’s heart.


Shalom. Remain near to God on His day.


Print this post

Did Only Jesus Ascend to Heaven—Not Elijah or Enoch? (Exploring John 3:13)

Question:
Some people wonder whether Elijah or Enoch actually ascended to heaven, especially in light of John 3:13, where Jesus says:

“No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven the Son of Man.”
(John 3:13, NIV)

Does this mean that only Jesus has ascended to heaven, and that Elijah and Enoch didn’t? Let’s examine the context and theological meaning behind this verse.


1. The Context of John 3:13

In John 3, Jesus is speaking to Nicodemus, a Pharisee and member of the Jewish ruling council, about spiritual rebirth and the Kingdom of God. Let’s read the passage in context:

“If I have told you earthly things and you do not believe, how can you believe if I tell you heavenly things? No one has ascended into heaven except he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man.”
(John 3:12–13, ESV)

Here, Jesus is not primarily making a historical statement about people who have been taken to heaven. Instead, He is emphasizing His unique authority to speak about heavenly things because He alone came down from heaven and possesses firsthand knowledge of God’s kingdom.


2. Elijah and Enoch: Were They Taken to Heaven?

Yes, Scripture clearly indicates that both Elijah and Enoch were taken by God in a supernatural way:

  • Enoch:

“Enoch walked with God; then he was no more, because God took him away.”
(Genesis 5:24, NIV)
The author of Hebrews confirms this:
“By faith Enoch was taken from this life, so that he did not experience death… he was taken away.”
(Hebrews 11:5, NIV)

  • Elijah:

“As they were walking along and talking together, suddenly a chariot of fire and horses of fire appeared and separated the two of them, and Elijah went up to heaven in a whirlwind.”
(2 Kings 2:11, NIV)

So yes, they were taken up, but what John 3:13 highlights is not about mere physical ascension. It’s about origin and authority.


3. The Difference Between Being “Taken to Heaven” and “Coming From Heaven”

Theologians point out that Jesus’ statement in John 3:13 is Christological focused on who Christ is. Jesus is not merely someone who ascends to heaven; He is the one who descended from heaven that is, He existed eternally with the Father before taking on human form (see John 1:1–14 and Philippians 2:6–8).

In contrast, Elijah and Enoch were taken to heaven by God but they were not from heaven. Their origin is earthly, and they were taken into God’s presence by divine choice, not by their own initiative or authority.

Think of it like this: someone who comes from a royal court knows its secrets in a way that a visitor never can. Jesus isn’t a visitor in heaven He is the eternal Son of God, the one who “came from above” (John 3:31), making Him the only one fully qualified to reveal heavenly truths.


4. Jesus: The Only One With Full Knowledge of Heaven

When Jesus says, “No one has ascended into heaven except the one who came from heaven”, He is stating that no human has gone up into heaven to comprehend it fully and return to reveal its truths to humanity. Only Jesus can do that because:

  • He is from heaven (John 6:38: “For I have come down from heaven…”)
  • He is one with the Father (John 10:30: “I and the Father are one.”)
  • He has seen the Father (John 1:18: “No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God… has made Him known.”)

Elijah and Enoch, though taken up, did not come back to reveal the mysteries of heaven or possess divine authority over them. Jesus alone does.


Understanding John 3:13 Correctly

John 3:13 does not deny that Elijah and Enoch were taken to heaven. Rather, it asserts that:

  • No human has ascended to heaven to gain divine knowledge and return to reveal it.
  • Only Jesus, who came down from heaven, possesses perfect understanding of God and His Kingdom.

Just as Jesus says later in John 6:46 (ESV):

“Not that anyone has seen the Father except he who is from God; he has seen the Father.”

This makes Jesus utterly unique not only in His divine origin, but also in His authority to teach heavenly truth and grant eternal life.


Maranatha Come, Lord Jesus.


Print this post

Did the Lord Jesus Appear to Judas Iscariot After His Resurrection?

(A Theological Examination Based on 1 Corinthians 15:5)

A question often raised by Bible readers is this: Did Jesus appear to Judas Iscariot after His resurrection? This question usually stems from 1 Corinthians 15:5, where the Apostle Paul writes:

“…and that he appeared to Cephas, and then to the Twelve.”
(1 Corinthians 15:5, NIV)

Given that Judas Iscariot was originally one of the Twelve Apostles, it may seem puzzling at first that Jesus appeared to “the Twelve” even though Judas had already died by suicide (Matthew 27:5) before the resurrection occurred.

Let’s unpack this both theologically and biblically.


Understanding the Term “The Twelve”

In the New Testament, the phrase “the Twelve” (Greek: hoi dōdeka) functions as a title for the core group of apostles appointed by Jesus during His earthly ministry (Luke 6:13-16). It became a collective label, often used even when fewer than twelve were physically present (see John 20:24, where Thomas was absent, yet the group is still referred to as the Twelve).

Importantly, “the Twelve” does not always imply the literal presence of all twelve original members at every appearance or event. It denotes the apostolic office and authority, not just a headcount.


What Happened to Judas?

According to the Gospels, Judas Iscariot betrayed Jesus and was overcome with guilt. In Matthew 27:5 (NIV), we read:

“So Judas threw the money into the temple and left. Then he went away and hanged himself.”

His death occurred before the crucifixion was complete, and certainly before the resurrection. Therefore, Judas did not witness or partake in any post resurrection appearances of Jesus.


Why Does Paul Say Jesus Appeared to “The Twelve”?

Paul, in 1 Corinthians 15, is summarizing the resurrection appearances of Jesus to substantiate the truth of the Gospel. Here’s the passage in context:

1 Corinthians 15:3–6 (NIV):
3 For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures,
4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,
5 and that he appeared to Cephas, and then to the Twelve.
6 After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time…

This mention of “the Twelve” must then refer to the apostolic office after Judas’s replacement that is, after Matthias had been chosen.


Matthias Replaces Judas

The Book of Acts records how the apostles, under divine guidance, selected Matthias to replace Judas in the apostolic ministry:

Acts 1:24–26 (NIV):
24 Then they prayed, “Lord, you know everyone’s heart. Show us which of these two you have chosen
25 to take over this apostolic ministry, which Judas left to go where he belongs.”
26 Then they cast lots, and the lot fell to Matthias; so he was added to the eleven apostles.

With Matthias added, the apostolic number was restored to twelve. Therefore, when Paul mentions Jesus appearing to “the Twelve,” he is referring to this restored group, not to the original Twelve including Judas.


  • Judas Iscariot did not see the resurrected Jesus. He died before Jesus rose from the dead (Matthew 27:5).
  • The phrase “the Twelve” in 1 Corinthians 15:5 is a title referring to the apostolic group not a literal reference to the original twelve individuals.
  • By the time of Paul’s writing, Matthias had been officially recognized as Judas’s replacement (Acts 1:26), and was likely included in the group referred to as “the Twelve.”
  • Therefore, 1 Corinthians 15:5 is not a contradiction, but a theological and ecclesial recognition of the complete apostolic band, restored after Judas’s fall.

No, Jesus did not appear to Judas Iscariot after His resurrection. Judas was no longer among the living at the time of Jesus’ post resurrection appearances. The reference to “the Twelve” in 1 Corinthians 15:5 should be understood in the context of the restored apostolic circle, which included Matthias in place of Judas.

Maranatha  The Lord is coming.


Print this post

Why is it not biblical to pray for the dead?

The Bible does not teach or show anywhere that praying for the dead is effective or commanded. The only related story is the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus in Luke 16:19-31 which actually illustrates why prayers for the dead are not effective.

In this story, a rich man who died and was in torment in Hades (the place of the dead) asks Abraham to send Lazarus, a poor man now comforted with Abraham, to warn his living brothers so they won’t also come to this place of torment. Abraham replies that the brothers have Moses and the Prophets (the Scriptures) and should listen to them. The rich man argues that a warning from someone risen from the dead would convince them, but Abraham says:

“If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be convinced if someone should rise from the dead.”
(Luke 16:31)

This indicates that after death, there is no second chance or intervention that can change a person’s eternal destiny. The rich man’s plea for his brothers to be spared is denied because God’s revealed Word is sufficient, and human testimony—even from the dead—would not change hardened hearts.

Further, Abraham explains there is a fixed chasm between those in torment and those in comfort:

“Between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, in order that those who would pass from here to you may not be able, and none may cross from there to us.”
(Luke 16:26)

This theological point stresses the permanence of eternal destinies after death: the saved are separated from the lost with no crossing back or forth. This directly challenges any notion that prayer can move souls between heaven and hell after death.

If prayers for the dead were valid, logically there would also be biblical prayers to remove someone from heaven and send them to hell—but such prayers do not exist in Scripture.

Praying for the dead or asking saints to intercede for deceased loved ones has no biblical foundation and cannot affect their eternal state. Instead, we are called to prepare for eternity now by trusting Christ and repenting from sin.

May the Lord grant us wisdom and faithfulness to live for Him every day.

Print this post

What is the difference between witnessing and preaching?

Answer:

Witnessing comes from the idea of giving a testimony—sharing what you have personally seen or experienced. For example, if someone witnesses a car accident and then tells others exactly what happened, they are giving a testimony or bearing witness to that event.

In Christian, witnessing (or bearing witness) is sharing firsthand experience of Jesus Christ—His character, His works, and His impact in one’s life. This is a vital part of the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19-20), where Jesus commands His followers to “go and make disciples.” Sharing your testimony about Jesus’ love and power is a powerful way to introduce others to Him.

Preaching, however, is a broader ministry that includes witnessing but also involves teaching, exhorting, warning, and explaining God’s Word. It is a more comprehensive proclamation of the Gospel message.

For instance, if the person who saw the car accident not only describes what happened but also teaches how to prevent such accidents and warns others about the dangers, they are preaching. In the same way, when a Christian moves from simply sharing personal experiences about Jesus to explaining the significance of His death and resurrection, calling people to respond in faith and repentance, they are preaching.

Preaching involves not just telling what Jesus has done but also calling for a response, emphasizing salvation, repentance, and obedience (2 Timothy 4:2,

“Preach the word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke and encourage—with great patience and careful instruction.”).

As believers, we are called both to witness—to share personal testimonies—and to preach, to proclaim the full Gospel message.

2 Timothy 4:5  reminds us:

“But you, keep your head in all situations, endure hardship, do the work of an evangelist, discharge all the duties of your ministry.”

Print this post

Is it Right for a Christian to Receive Money from Someone Involved in Illegal Activities?

This is a serious and relevant question in today’s world, especially for believers in ministry, church leadership, or even just in everyday Christian living. Can a Christian accept money from someone whose income is derived from illegal activities like drug trafficking, robbery, or fraud?

Biblically  answer is no.

1. Participation in Sin by Association

Accepting money from someone involved in sinful or illegal work makes you a participant, even if indirectly. The Bible is clear that believers are called to be holy and separate from wickedness:

Ephesians 5:11
“Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.”

When a believer receives money from an unlawful source, they are no longer exposing evil—they’re benefiting from it.

2. You Can’t Separate the Fruit from the Tree

You cannot claim to disapprove of someone’s sinful lifestyle and at the same time receive the benefits of that lifestyle. Jesus used the imagery of trees and fruit to show that what comes from a corrupt source is also corrupt:

Luke 6:43–44
“No good tree bears bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit. Each tree is recognized by its own fruit.”

If the “tree” (the person’s source of income) is bad, then the “fruit” (the money they earn) is also bad. You can’t accept one without endorsing the other.

3. God Rejects Sacrifices from the Wicked

Scripture makes it clear that God is not interested in offerings or sacrifices that come from unclean hands. No matter how big the amount, if it’s gained through evil, God detests it.

Proverbs 15:8
“The Lord detests the sacrifice of the wicked, but the prayer of the upright pleases him.”

Proverbs 21:27
“The sacrifice of the wicked is detestable—how much more so when brought with evil intent!”

Deuteronomy 23:18 
“You must not bring the earnings of a female prostitute or of a male prostitute into the house of the Lord your God to pay any vow, because the Lord your God detests them both.”

This shows that God is not only concerned with the act of giving but also with the source and the heart behind the giving.

4. Repentance Comes Before Giving

If someone involved in illegal work wants to support the church or give to a believer, the right step is to first repent—to turn away from that lifestyle and receive Christ fully.

Only after their heart and life have changed can their resources be considered clean. As Jesus said, when the tree is made good, the fruit will also be good.

2 Corinthians 5:17 
“Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!”

This means their source of income should reflect their new life in Christ. Honesty, integrity, and righteousness are marks of a true believer.

5. Spiritual Consequences of Accepting Unclean Money

Many people who accept money from criminal or sinful sources often find that it brings more harm than good. That’s because the money comes not only with physical value but also with spiritual baggage—often tied to greed, deceit, oppression, and even demonic influence.

1 Timothy 6:10 
“For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs.”

This verse doesn’t just speak of the love of money—it highlights how chasing or benefiting from unrighteous wealth can lead people into spiritual ruin.

As Christians, we are called to live in holiness—not just in our words and actions, but also in the sources of our resources. Whether you are in ministry or not, it is never right to accept money earned through illegal or sinful means. That includes tithes, offerings, or donations.

Instead, call the giver to repentance and encourage them to seek lawful, honest work that reflects their new identity in Christ. Only then will their giving be a blessing, both to them and to others.

May the Lord give us discernment and integrity in all areas of life—including the money we receive.
Come, Lord Jesus!

Print this post

Was Jesus Crucified on a Cross or a Tree?

Question: Galatians 3:13 says Jesus was “hung on a tree,” yet John 19:19 states that He was crucified on a cross. So which is it? Was it a literal tree, a vertical stake, or a traditional cross made of two beams? And does it even matter?

Answer: Let’s start by examining the Scriptures.

Galatians 3:13 (ESV)  “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us for it is written, ‘Cursed is everyone who is hanged on a tree.’”

Paul here is quoting Deuteronomy 21:22–23, where it was written in the Law of Moses:

Deuteronomy 21:22–23 (ESV): “And if a man has committed a crime punishable by death and he is put to death, and you hang him on a tree, his body shall not remain all night on the tree, but you shall bury him the same day, for a hanged man is cursed by God.”

By referencing this passage, Paul is emphasizing the theological truth that Jesus bore the curse of sin in our place. The phrase “hung on a tree” (Greek: xylon) doesn’t necessarily mean a literal tree; rather, it refers to anything made of wood. The term was used in Greek literature to describe wooden instruments of execution, including crosses and stakes.

John 19:19 (ESV)  “Pilate also wrote an inscription and put it on the cross. It read, ‘Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews.’”

Here the Greek word for cross is stauros, which historically referred to an upright stake, but by the Roman period, it commonly denoted the two-beamed structure known as a crucifix. Roman crucifixions were widespread and well-documented, and they typically used a crux immissa a cross formed by two beams intersecting like a “+” or “t.”

Historical Context of Crucifixion

The Roman Empire, which ruled Judea during Jesus’ earthly life, practiced crucifixion as a public, torturous, and shameful method of execution reserved for slaves, revolutionaries, and the most despised criminals. According to Roman historian Tacitus, crucifixion was designed to maximize suffering and humiliation.

Most historical evidence shows that the Romans used a two-beam cross: a vertical post (stipes) permanently fixed in the ground, and a horizontal beam (patibulum) which the condemned would carry to the site of execution. Once there, they would be affixed to the patibulum, which was then hoisted onto the stipes to form the cross.

Matthew 27:32 (ESV)  “As they went out, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name. They compelled this man to carry his cross.”
This likely refers to the patibulum, the horizontal beam, which Jesus was too weak to carry after being scourged.

Theologically, the shape or design of the cross is not what carries weight what matters is who was crucified and why.

  • Isaiah 53:5 (ESV)  “But he was pierced for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace, and with his wounds we are healed.”
  • 1 Peter 2:24 (ESV)  “He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed.”

The phrase “on the tree” in Peter’s epistle echoes Deuteronomy and Galatians, reinforcing that Jesus’ crucifixion fulfilled the curse of the Law so that sinners might be redeemed.

Does the Shape of the Cross Matter?

Some groups, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses, argue that Jesus died on a single upright stake. However, the shape of the wood is not a requirement for salvation. The central tenets of the Gospel are:

  1. Jesus died for our sins according to the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:3),
  2. He was buried,
  3. He rose again on the third day,
  4. And He will come again in glory (Acts 1:11, Revelation 22:12).

Whether one envisions a single vertical post or a traditional cross does not impact salvation. What is essential is faith in the redemptive work of Christ, repentance from sin, and new life through Him.

Secondary Matters vs. Essential Doctrine

Knowing the type of wood used, the size, or the exact appearance of the cross doesn’t affect our standing before God. Just as knowing what Jesus looked like physically adds nothing to our salvation, neither does knowing the precise design of the instrument on which He died.

As Paul writes:

1 Corinthians 2:2 (ESV)  “For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified.”

The message of the cross is what matters not its shape.

Jesus was most likely crucified on a two-beamed wooden cross, consistent with Roman practices. Yet, theologically, what matters is that He was crucified not the shape of the wood. Believers should focus not on the external instrument, but on the internal reality of the atonement, resurrection, and return of Christ.

Let us continue in repentance, walk in holiness, and wait in hope.

Maranatha! Come, Lord Jesus!

Print this post

Why Did God Forbid Taking a Millstone as Collateral?

(Deuteronomy 24:6)

Scripture Reference:
“Do not take a pair of millstones not even the upper one as security for a debt, because that would be taking a person’s livelihood as security.”

Deuteronomy 24:6, NIV

“It is wrong to take a set of millstones, or even just the upper millstone, as security for a loan, for the owner uses it to make a living.” Deuteronomy 24:6, NLT


Historical and Cultural Context

In biblical times, the millstone was a vital household tool used for grinding grain to make flour an essential part of daily life. It was composed of two stones: a lower (stationary) stone and an upper (rotating) one. This tool was not a luxury it was as essential as a cooking pot or a stove is today.

Because it was central to survival, particularly for poor families who ground their own grain for daily meals, God strictly prohibited it from being taken as collateral for a loan.

God’s law in Deuteronomy 24:6 reveals His heart for justice and compassion especially for the poor and vulnerable. Taking a millstone as a pledge wasn’t just seizing a piece of property it was equivalent to taking someone’s very life, because it deprived them of their ability to feed themselves and their family.

This aligns with other laws found in the Torah that protect human dignity, even in economic transactions:

Exodus 22:26-27 (NIV)

“If you take your neighbor’s cloak as a pledge, return it by sunset, because that cloak is the only covering your ne

ighbor has… When they cry out to me, I will hear, for I am compassionate.”

Leviticus 25:35-37 (NIV)

“If any of your fellow Israelites become poor and are unable to support themselves… do not take int

erest or any profit from them, but fear your God…”

These laws collectively point to a key biblical principle: economics must never override mercy.


Practical and Spiritual Lessons

  1. God Prioritizes Human Life Over Financial Gain
    The law protects the poor by ensuring that their basic tools for survival aren’t confiscated. This shows that God values life more than material repayment.
  2. Lending Should Be Anchored in Compassion
    As Christians, we are encouraged to lend generously without expecting anything in return, especially when helping those in dire need.

“Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.”  Matthew 5:42 (NIV)

  1. Faith That Reflects God’s Justice and Mercy
    Believers are called to mirror God’s character not just in worship, but in daily interactions, including business and finance.

“Learn to do right; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow.”  Isaiah 1:17 (NIV)

God’s command not to take a millstone as a pledge isn’t just about ancient lending practices it reveals a divine standard of mercy, justice, and compassion. We are reminded that helping the poor should come from a heart of love, not from a desire for profit. When we reflect this grace, we honor God and make our faith attractive to others.

May the Lord bless you as you walk in His wisdom and love.


Print this post